"In a 25-page motion filed Wednesday with the FTC, Amazon argued that Khan has made public comments about Amazon and its conduct, including that the company is “guilty of antitrust violations and should be broken up,” suggesting she lacks impartiality in antitrust investigations into Amazon."
Well geez, far be it from investigators to find out and opine on the wrongdoings of entities before the official investigation. Isn't this how warrants are granted in criminal law?
Consider leaving out the “boo hoos” — not because they aren’t warranted by the facts, but rather, because they: a.) do not strengthen your (already strong) arguments; and b.) give opponents an opportunity to discredit your sobriety to draw attention away from the devastating impact of your arguments.
"In a 25-page motion filed Wednesday with the FTC, Amazon argued that Khan has made public comments about Amazon and its conduct, including that the company is “guilty of antitrust violations and should be broken up,” suggesting she lacks impartiality in antitrust investigations into Amazon."
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/30/amazon-seeks-recusal-of-ftc-chair-lina-khan-in-antitrust-probes.html
Well geez, far be it from investigators to find out and opine on the wrongdoings of entities before the official investigation. Isn't this how warrants are granted in criminal law?
Consider leaving out the “boo hoos” — not because they aren’t warranted by the facts, but rather, because they: a.) do not strengthen your (already strong) arguments; and b.) give opponents an opportunity to discredit your sobriety to draw attention away from the devastating impact of your arguments.